Appendix CAS.
The Cascade Ranges Region
Contributing
Authors: David Stoms, Katherine Warner, and Frank Davis
Regional Character
Land Stewardship
Plant Community Types
Regional Character
Figure CAS-1.
Shaded relief image of the Cascade Ranges Region.
The volcanic
Cascade Ranges Region (Figure CAS-1) encompasses 20,681 km²
between the Oregon border on the north and the Sierra Nevada region
on the south. The primary topographic features are the volcanic
cones of Mount Shasta and Lassen Peak. The southern boundary near
the North Fork of the Feather River is marked by the contact between
the recent volcanic rock of the Cascades to the older metamorphics
of the Sierra. Similarly, the boundary on the west with the Northwestern
California region is a contact zone with predominantly metamorphic
rock near the Sacramento River and Interstate 5. The Modoc Plateau
region lies to the east in the rainshadow of the Cascades. South
of Red Bluff, the region adjoins the Great Central Valley with its
agriculture and California prairie community compared to the chaparral
and foothill woodlands in the Cascades. Vegetation does not generally
display distinct breaks at the geologically defined boundaries with
the Sierra and Northwestern California and the climatically defined
boundary with the Modoc Plateau.
Land Stewardship
Figure CAS-2
shows the management status of lands in the Cascade Ranges Region.
Slightly less than half of the region is publicly owned, which is
comparable to the state as a whole. The public ownership is widely
distributed among U.S. Forest Service (37.5% of the total region),
BLM (4.0%), Native American reservations (<0.1%), National Park
Service (2.1%), state parks (0.1%), California Fish & Game (1.2%),
and other state land (0.3%). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and other
non-governmental organizations own 0.6% of the land area.
Figure CAS-2.
Management status of lands in the Cascade Ranges Region. See text
for definitions of management levels.
The region
has the third lowest proportion of lands in status 1 or 2 managed
areas (Table CAS-1). At 7.1%, the Cascade Ranges region exceeds
only the Modoc Plateau and the Great Central Valley. The predominant
blocks of lands managed for biodiversity in the region are Lassen
Volcanic National Park-Caribou Wilderness and the Ishi Wilderness/Tehama
Wildlife Area/Gray Davis-Dye Creek Preserve complexes. The latter
is one of the few large protected sites in the foothill zone of
California.
Table CAS-1. Area
and percentage of land surface by management status level of the Cascade
Ranges Region.
Status |
Area
(km²) |
% |
1 |
1,095 |
5.3 |
2 |
380 |
1.8 |
3 |
7,921 |
38.5 |
4 |
11,187 |
54.4 |
Total
|
20,583 |
100.0 |
Figure CAS-3.
Comparison of the proportion of managed areas with all lands in the
Cascade Ranges Region by elevation zones.
The management
levels are distributed unevenly across elevation zones (Figure CAS-3).
In the two elevation zones below 1000 m, the proportions of management
status 1 and 2 lands is similar to all lands in the region. Above
2000 m, the proportion that is managed for biodiversity far exceeds
that for all lands. In the 1000-1500 m zone, however, only a very
small proportion is protected. This elevational pattern reflects
the protection of the higher mountains and the Ishi/Tehama/Gray
Davis-Dye Creek complex in the foothills with very little protection
at mid-elevations.
Plant Community
Types
Floristic information
was derived mainly from our own field surveys plus digital maps
from the Lassen, Modoc, Klamath, and Shasta National Forests. Some
species information was also obtained from a recent hardwoods inventory
(Pacific Meridian Resources, unpublished 1996), the Sierra Nevada
Ecosystem Project's mapping of Late Successional-Old Growth Forests
(Franklin et al. 1996), the land cover map of the Eagle Lake Resource
Area of the BLM (version dated January, 1996), the 1996 land cover
map jointly produced from 1990 TM imagery by the USFS and California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Soil-Vegetation maps
from the USFS and State of California, and unpublished maps from
the VTM survey (Wieslander 1946). Site visits to 232 landscape units
were also used to resolve conflicts between sources or to verify
older information.
The land cover
database for the Cascade Ranges Region consists of 685 landscape
units, providing distributional information on 70 dominant plant
species, 51 plant community types, and 10 other land use/cover types.
Two community types were defined for CA-GAPLow Sagebrush Scrub
and Cercocarpus ledifolius Woodland. Average polygon size
is approximately 3,000 ha.
Based on 1995
UCSB field surveys and on comparisons with independent sources of
vegetation data, the vegetation map probably overestimates the extent
of conifer forest types and underestimates the extent of shrubland
and mid-elevational hardwood types. The northernmost and southernmost
portions of the region were field checked most extensively. The
central portion was only partially covered by the VTM surveys. Field
mapping was least extensive in high elevation areas and sites around
the northern arms of Lake Shasta which extend north and east along
the McCloud and Pit river drainages and the east slope of the southern
Cascades. Classification of Eastside versus Westside Ponderosa Pine
Forest or Sierra Mixed Conifer Forest is not highly reliable when
based solely on dominant canopy trees as was done for CA-GAP. Floristic
information is generally more reliable on public lands than on private
lands.
Table CAS-2. Percent
area of each CNDDB community type at each management status level
in the Cascade Ranges Region. * indicates an addition to the standard
CNDDB classification (Holland 1986).
CNDDB
Code |
CNDDB
Community Name (Holland 1986) |
CNDDB
Rank |
Status
1 % |
Status
2 % |
Status
3 % |
Status
4 % |
Total
Mapped Distribution (km²) |
Status
1+2 % |
35100 |
Great
Basin Mixed Scrub |
S4 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
58.5 |
40.6 |
279.8 |
0.9 |
35210 |
Big
Sagebrush Scrub |
S4 |
0.0 |
2.4 |
72.2 |
25.0 |
198.1 |
2.4 |
35211 |
Low
Sagebrush Scrub * |
-- |
0.0 |
0.0 |
48.7 |
51.3 |
7.8 |
0.0 |
35220 |
Subalpine
Sagebrush Scrub |
S3.2 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
82.8 |
17.0 |
68.3 |
0.2 |
35400 |
Rabbitbrush
Scrub |
S5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
61.4 |
38.6 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
35500 |
Cercocarpus
ledifolius Woodland * |
-- |
1.5 |
0.1 |
46.2 |
52.2 |
39.9 |
1.6 |
37110 |
Northern
Mixed Chaparral |
S4 |
25.3 |
8.4 |
29.6 |
36.7 |
37.4 |
33.7 |
37510 |
Mixed
Montane Chaparral |
S4 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
25.3 |
73.2 |
52.9 |
1.5 |
37520 |
Montane
Manzanita Chaparral |
S4 |
3.7 |
1.0 |
48.2 |
47.1 |
395.1 |
4.7 |
37530 |
Montane
Ceanothus Chaparral |
S4/3.3 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
34.5 |
64.1 |
260.6 |
1.4 |
37541 |
Shin
Oak Brush |
S3.3 |
4.1 |
7.1 |
51.5 |
37.3 |
128.1 |
11.2 |
37550 |
Bush
Chinquapin Chaparral |
S3.3 |
14.8 |
0.0 |
47.6 |
37.6 |
92.1 |
14.8 |
37810 |
Buck
Brush Chaparral |
S4 |
6.7 |
7.0 |
13.8 |
72.5 |
80.2 |
13.7 |
37A00 |
Interior
Live Oak Chaparral |
S3.3 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
14.8 |
84.4 |
55.8 |
0.8 |
37E00 |
Mesic
North Slope Chaparral |
S3.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
78.1 |
21.9 |
13.2 |
0.0 |
42200 |
Non-Native
Grassland |
S4 |
0.4 |
1.8 |
2.7 |
95.1 |
527.4 |
2.2 |
43000 |
Great
Basin Grassland |
S1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
30.6 |
63.7 |
0.8 |
0.0 |
45100 |
Montane
Meadow |
S3.2 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
39.0 |
60.3 |
105.4 |
0.7 |
45200 |
Subalpine
or Alpine Meadow |
S3.2 |
0.6 |
15.4 |
48.8 |
35.0 |
47.8 |
16.0 |
61410 |
Great
Valley Cottonwood Riparian Forest |
S2.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
12.5 |
87.5 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
61420 |
Great
Valley Mixed Riparian Forest |
S2.2 |
17.7 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
78.5 |
18.8 |
20.2 |
61430 |
Great
Valley Valley Oak Riparian Forest |
S1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
4.6 |
95.4 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
61510 |
White
Alder Riparian Forest |
S4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
13.8 |
0.0 |
61610 |
Modoc-Great
Basin Cottonwood-Willow Riparian Forest |
S2.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
100.0 |
0.0 |
11.4 |
0.0 |
63500 |
Montane
Riparian Scrub |
S4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
18.0 |
82.0 |
15.7 |
0.0 |
71110 |
Oregon
Oak Woodland |
S3.3 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
28.9 |
70.0 |
223.3 |
1.1 |
71120 |
Black
Oak Woodland |
S3.2 |
0.8 |
4.7 |
41.2 |
53.3 |
232.4 |
5.5 |
71130 |
Valley
Oak Woodland |
S2.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
13.4 |
86.6 |
6.4 |
0.0 |
71140 |
Blue
Oak Woodland |
S3.2 |
13.7 |
9.2 |
3.7 |
73.4 |
758.4 |
22.9 |
71150 |
Interior
Live Oak Woodland |
S3.2 |
1.5 |
4.8 |
26.3 |
67.4 |
148.8 |
6.3 |
71310 |
Open
Foothill Pine Woodland |
S4 |
11.5 |
7.8 |
8.8 |
71.8 |
622.1 |
19.3 |
71322 |
Non-Serpentine
Foothill Pine Woodland |
S4 |
5.5 |
3.5 |
15.7 |
75.4 |
158.0 |
9.0 |
71410 |
Foothill
Pine-Oak Woodland |
S4 |
4.3 |
1.0 |
8.1 |
86.6 |
843.4 |
5.3 |
71430 |
Juniper-Oak
Cismontane Woodland |
S3.2 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
14.0 |
85.9 |
135.9 |
0.1 |
72100 |
Great
Basin Woodlands |
S3.2/4 |
0.0 |
1.8 |
40.2 |
57.9 |
1,199.3 |
1.8 |
81320 |
Canyon
Live Oak Forest |
S4 |
15.9 |
0.0 |
36.1 |
48.0 |
85.1 |
15.9 |
81330 |
Interior
Live Oak Forest |
S4 |
0.0 |
1.1 |
35.1 |
63.8 |
64.5 |
1.1 |
81340 |
Black
Oak Forest |
S4 |
2.3 |
0.1 |
40.6 |
56.9 |
473.6 |
2.4 |
81400 |
Tan-Oak
Forest |
S4 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
62.0 |
37.7 |
11.7 |
0.3 |
83210 |
Knobcone
Pine Forest |
S4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
83.8 |
16.2 |
32.2 |
0.0 |
84210 |
Westside
Ponderosa Pine Forest |
S2.1 |
4.4 |
1.1 |
45.3 |
49.2 |
2,347.3 |
5.5 |
84220 |
Eastside
Ponderosa Pine Forest |
S2.1 |
2.4 |
1.5 |
60.6 |
35.5 |
1,821.5 |
3.9 |
84230 |
Sierran
Mixed Coniferous Forest |
S4 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
39.4 |
58.1 |
5,507.1 |
2.5 |
84240 |
Sierran
White Fir Forest |
S4 |
1.9 |
2.7 |
36.9 |
58.4 |
196.6 |
4.6 |
85100 |
Jeffrey
Pine Forest |
S4 |
3.8 |
5.9 |
66.4 |
23.9 |
47.7 |
9.7 |
85210 |
Jeffrey
Pine-Fir Forest |
S4 |
23.8 |
0.3 |
54.5 |
21.5 |
419.2 |
24.1 |
85310 |
Red
Fir Forest |
S4 |
26.4 |
2.0 |
55.6 |
16.1 |
761.1 |
28.4 |
86100 |
Lodgepole
Pine Forest |
S4 |
24.6 |
0.5 |
58.1 |
16.8 |
238.9 |
25.1 |
86210 |
Whitebark
Pine-Mountain Hemlock Forest |
S4 |
48.2 |
0.0 |
19.0 |
32.8 |
52.4 |
48.2 |
86600 |
Whitebark
Pine Forest |
S4 |
91.5 |
0.0 |
5.6 |
2.9 |
7.9 |
91.5 |
91110 |
Klamath-Cascade
Fell-field |
S4 |
94.1 |
0.0 |
4.8 |
1.1 |
54.1 |
94.1 |
|
Regional
Total-Natural Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
18,921.2 |
|
|
Regional
Total (incl nonvegetated) |
|
5.3 |
1.8 |
38.5 |
54.4 |
20,679 |
7.1 |
We call attention
to three categories of poor representation and one in which types
appear to be well protected. Table CAS-2 gives the area of mapped
distribution and proportions in each management level for every
community type.
1. Plant
community types occurring mainly on status 4 lands. Only Non-Native
Grassland has a mapped area greater than 25 km² in the region
with more than 90% in status 4 lands (primarily privately owned).
This type mostly occurs in the lower elevations adjacent to the
Great Central Valley. Interior Live Oak Chaparral, Foothill Pine-Oak
Woodland, and Juniper-Oak Woodland have greater than 80% in status
4. The Juniper-Oak Woodland type is composed of California juniper
with shrubby blue oak. It is generally restricted to the Inner Coast
Ranges between Ventura County and Mt. Diablo (Holland 1986), and
its occurrence north of Red Bluff near the region boundary is an
unusual outlier from the main distribution.
2. Scrub,
chaparral, and herbaceous types mainly located in unprotected areas.
Virtually all of the Great Basin scrub communities (Great Basin
Mixed Scrub, Big Sagebrush Scrub, Subalpine Sagebrush Scrub, and
Cercocarpus ledifolius Woodland) and the montane chaparral
types (Mixed Montane Chaparral, Montane Manzanita Chaparral, and
Montane Ceanothus Chaparral) are poorly represented in status 1
or 2 managed areas of the Cascade Ranges region (all under 5%).
Interior Live Oak Chaparral, Non-Native Grassland, and Montane Meadows
have similar low representation. The concerns for most of these
types are the potential impacts of grazing and invasions of exotic
plant species on native ecosystems. Interior Live Oak Chaparral,
Mixed Montane Chaparral, and Subalpine Sagebrush Scrub, however,
occur more extensively in other regions.
3. Forest
and woodland types mainly located in unprotected areas. Most
of the woodland and lower elevation forest types have low levels
of representation in this region. These include Oregon Oak Woodland,
Interior Live Oak Woodland and Forest, Black Oak Woodland and Forest,
Non-Serpentine Foothill Pine Woodland, Foothill Pine-Oak Woodland,
and Juniper-Oak Cismontane Woodland of the broadleaf or mixed types.
The conifer types that are poorly represented are the Great Basin
Woodlands on the eastern side of the region and Knobcone Pine Forest,
Westside and Eastside Ponderosa Pine Forest, Sierran Mixed Coniferous
Forest, Sieran White Fir Forest, and Jeffrey Pine Forest. These
types are of management concern because timber harvest and/or grazing
prevail on both public and private lands where these communities
occur. Blue Oak Woodland and Open Foothill Pine Woodland tend to
be poorly represented in managed areas in other parts of the state,
but in the Cascades, relatively high percentages of their distributions
occur in the large complex (Ishi/Tehama/Gray Davis-Dye Creek) of
low elevation managed areas.
4. Community
types that appear well-protected. Five community types in this
region are relatively well-represented (i.e., > 25% in status
1 or 2). Most of these are the upper montane, subalpine, or alpine
types (Red Fir, Lodgepole, and Whitebark Pine-Mountain Hemlock Forests
and Klamath-Cascades Fell-field). This pattern reflects the high
proportion of land at higher elevations managed as wilderness or
national park in this region. The other well-represented type is
Northern Mixed Chaparral.